NAG FL Interface
e04fcf (lsq_uncon_mod_func_comp)
1
Purpose
e04fcf is a comprehensive algorithm for finding an unconstrained minimum of a sum of squares of $m$ nonlinear functions in $n$ variables $\left(m\ge n\right)$. No derivatives are required.
The routine is intended for functions which have continuous first and second derivatives (although it will usually work even if the derivatives have occasional discontinuities).
2
Specification
Fortran Interface
Subroutine e04fcf ( 
m, n, lsqfun, lsqmon, iprint, maxcal, eta, xtol, stepmx, x, fsumsq, fvec, fjac, ldfjac, s, v, ldv, niter, nf, iw, liw, w, lw, ifail) 
Integer, Intent (In) 
:: 
m, n, iprint, maxcal, ldfjac, ldv, liw, lw 
Integer, Intent (Inout) 
:: 
iw(liw), ifail 
Integer, Intent (Out) 
:: 
niter, nf 
Real (Kind=nag_wp), Intent (In) 
:: 
eta, xtol, stepmx 
Real (Kind=nag_wp), Intent (Inout) 
:: 
x(n), fjac(ldfjac,n), v(ldv,n), w(lw) 
Real (Kind=nag_wp), Intent (Out) 
:: 
fsumsq, fvec(m), s(n) 
External 
:: 
lsqfun, lsqmon 

C Header Interface
#include <nag.h>
void 
e04fcf_ (const Integer *m, const Integer *n, void (NAG_CALL *lsqfun)(Integer *iflag, const Integer *m, const Integer *n, const double xc[], double fvec[], Integer iw[], const Integer *liw, double w[], const Integer *lw), void (NAG_CALL *lsqmon)(const Integer *m, const Integer *n, const double xc[], const double fvec[], const double fjac[], const Integer *ldfjac, const double s[], const Integer *igrade, const Integer *niter, const Integer *nf, Integer iw[], const Integer *liw, double w[], const Integer *lw), const Integer *iprint, const Integer *maxcal, const double *eta, const double *xtol, const double *stepmx, double x[], double *fsumsq, double fvec[], double fjac[], const Integer *ldfjac, double s[], double v[], const Integer *ldv, Integer *niter, Integer *nf, Integer iw[], const Integer *liw, double w[], const Integer *lw, Integer *ifail) 

C++ Header Interface
#include <nag.h> extern "C" {
void 
e04fcf_ (const Integer &m, const Integer &n, void (NAG_CALL *lsqfun)(Integer &iflag, const Integer &m, const Integer &n, const double xc[], double fvec[], Integer iw[], const Integer &liw, double w[], const Integer &lw), void (NAG_CALL *lsqmon)(const Integer &m, const Integer &n, const double xc[], const double fvec[], const double fjac[], const Integer &ldfjac, const double s[], const Integer &igrade, const Integer &niter, const Integer &nf, Integer iw[], const Integer &liw, double w[], const Integer &lw), const Integer &iprint, const Integer &maxcal, const double &eta, const double &xtol, const double &stepmx, double x[], double &fsumsq, double fvec[], double fjac[], const Integer &ldfjac, double s[], double v[], const Integer &ldv, Integer &niter, Integer &nf, Integer iw[], const Integer &liw, double w[], const Integer &lw, Integer &ifail) 
}

The routine may be called by the names e04fcf or nagf_opt_lsq_uncon_mod_func_comp.
3
Description
e04fcf is essentially identical to the subroutine LSQNDN in the NPL Algorithms Library. It is applicable to problems of the form
where
$x={\left({x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{n}\right)}^{\mathrm{T}}$ and
$m\ge n$. (The functions
${f}_{i}\left(x\right)$ are often referred to as ‘residuals’.)
You must supply
lsqfun to calculate the values of the
${f}_{i}\left(x\right)$ at any point
$x$.
From a starting point
${x}^{\left(1\right)}$ supplied by you, the routine generates a sequence of points
${x}^{\left(2\right)},{x}^{\left(3\right)},\dots $, which is intended to converge to a local minimum of
$F\left(x\right)$. The sequence of points is given by
where the vector
${p}^{\left(k\right)}$ is a direction of search, and
${\alpha}^{\left(k\right)}$ is chosen such that
$F\left({x}^{\left(k\right)}+{\alpha}^{\left(k\right)}{p}^{\left(k\right)}\right)$ is approximately a minimum with respect to
${\alpha}^{\left(k\right)}$.
The vector ${p}^{\left(k\right)}$ used depends upon the reduction in the sum of squares obtained during the last iteration. If the sum of squares was sufficiently reduced, then ${p}^{\left(k\right)}$ is an approximation to the Gauss–Newton direction; otherwise additional function evaluations are made so as to enable ${p}^{\left(k\right)}$ to be a more accurate approximation to the Newton direction.
The method is designed to ensure that steady progress is made whatever the starting point, and to have the rapid ultimate convergence of Newton's method.
4
References
Gill P E and Murray W (1978) Algorithms for the solution of the nonlinear least squares problem SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 15 977–992
5
Arguments

1:
$\mathbf{m}$ – Integer
Input

2:
$\mathbf{n}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the number $m$ of residuals, ${f}_{i}\left(x\right)$, and the number $n$ of variables, ${x}_{j}$.
Constraint:
$1\le {\mathbf{n}}\le {\mathbf{m}}$.

3:
$\mathbf{lsqfun}$ – Subroutine, supplied by the user.
External Procedure

lsqfun must calculate the vector of values
${f}_{i}\left(x\right)$ at any point
$x$. (However, if you do not wish to calculate the residuals at a particular
$x$, there is the option of setting an argument to cause
e04fcf to terminate immediately.)
The specification of
lsqfun is:
Fortran Interface
Integer, Intent (In) 
:: 
m, n, liw, lw 
Integer, Intent (Inout) 
:: 
iflag, iw(liw) 
Real (Kind=nag_wp), Intent (In) 
:: 
xc(n) 
Real (Kind=nag_wp), Intent (Inout) 
:: 
w(lw) 
Real (Kind=nag_wp), Intent (Out) 
:: 
fvec(m) 

C Header Interface
void 
lsqfun_ (Integer *iflag, const Integer *m, const Integer *n, const double xc[], double fvec[], Integer iw[], const Integer *liw, double w[], const Integer *lw) 

C++ Header Interface
#include <nag.h> extern "C" {
void 
lsqfun_ (Integer &iflag, const Integer &m, const Integer &n, const double xc[], double fvec[], Integer iw[], const Integer &liw, double w[], const Integer &lw) 
}


1:
$\mathbf{iflag}$ – Integer
Input/Output

On entry: has a nonnegative value.
On exit: if
lsqfun resets
iflag to some negative number,
e04fcf will terminate immediately, with
ifail set to your setting of
iflag.

2:
$\mathbf{m}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: $m$, the numbers of residuals.

3:
$\mathbf{n}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: $n$, the numbers of variables.

4:
$\mathbf{xc}\left({\mathbf{n}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Input

On entry: the point $x$ at which the values of the ${f}_{i}$ are required.

5:
$\mathbf{fvec}\left({\mathbf{m}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Output

On exit: unless
iflag is reset to a negative number,
${\mathbf{fvec}}\left(\mathit{i}\right)$ must contain the value of
${f}_{\mathit{i}}$ at the point
$x$, for
$\mathit{i}=1,2,\dots ,m$.

6:
$\mathbf{iw}\left({\mathbf{liw}}\right)$ – Integer array
Workspace

7:
$\mathbf{liw}$ – Integer
Input

8:
$\mathbf{w}\left({\mathbf{lw}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Workspace

9:
$\mathbf{lw}$ – Integer
Input

lsqfun is called with these arguments as in the call to
e04fcf, so you can pass quantities to
lsqfun from the subroutine which calls
e04fcf by using partitions of
iw and
w beyond those used as workspace by
e04fcf. However, because of the danger of mistakes in partitioning, it is recommended that this facility be used very selectively, e.g., for stable applications packages which need to pass their own variable dimension workspace to
lsqfun. It is
recommended that the normal method for passing information from your subroutine to
lsqfun should be via COMMON global variables. In any case, you
must not change liw,
lw or the elements of
iw and
w used as workspace by
e04fcf.
lsqfun must either be a module subprogram USEd by, or declared as EXTERNAL in, the (sub)program from which
e04fcf is called. Arguments denoted as
Input must
not be changed by this procedure.
Note: lsqfun should not return floatingpoint NaN (Not a Number) or infinity values, since these are not handled by
e04fcf. If your code inadvertently
does return any NaNs or infinities,
e04fcf is likely to produce unexpected results.
lsqfun should be tested separately before being used in conjunction with
e04fcf.

4:
$\mathbf{lsqmon}$ – Subroutine, supplied by the NAG Library or the user.
External Procedure

If
${\mathbf{iprint}}\ge 0$, you must supply
lsqmon which is suitable for monitoring the minimization process.
lsqmon must not change the values of any of its arguments.
If
${\mathbf{iprint}}<0$, the dummy routine
e04fdz can be used as
lsqmon.
The specification of
lsqmon is:
Fortran Interface
Subroutine lsqmon ( 
m, n, xc, fvec, fjac, ldfjac, s, igrade, niter, nf, iw, liw, w, lw) 
Integer, Intent (In) 
:: 
m, n, ldfjac, igrade, niter, nf, liw, lw 
Integer, Intent (Inout) 
:: 
iw(liw) 
Real (Kind=nag_wp), Intent (In) 
:: 
xc(n), fvec(m), fjac(ldfjac,n), s(n) 
Real (Kind=nag_wp), Intent (Inout) 
:: 
w(lw) 

C Header Interface
void 
lsqmon_ (const Integer *m, const Integer *n, const double xc[], const double fvec[], const double fjac[], const Integer *ldfjac, const double s[], const Integer *igrade, const Integer *niter, const Integer *nf, Integer iw[], const Integer *liw, double w[], const Integer *lw) 

C++ Header Interface
#include <nag.h> extern "C" {
void 
lsqmon_ (const Integer &m, const Integer &n, const double xc[], const double fvec[], const double fjac[], const Integer &ldfjac, const double s[], const Integer &igrade, const Integer &niter, const Integer &nf, Integer iw[], const Integer &liw, double w[], const Integer &lw) 
}

Important: the dimension declaration for
fjac must contain the variable
ldfjac, not an integer constant.

1:
$\mathbf{m}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: $m$, the numbers of residuals.

2:
$\mathbf{n}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: $n$, the numbers of variables.

3:
$\mathbf{xc}\left({\mathbf{n}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Input

On entry: the coordinates of the current point $x$.

4:
$\mathbf{fvec}\left({\mathbf{m}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Input

On entry: the values of the residuals ${f}_{i}$ at the current point $x$.

5:
$\mathbf{fjac}\left({\mathbf{ldfjac}},{\mathbf{n}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Input

On entry: ${\mathbf{fjac}}\left(\mathit{i},\mathit{j}\right)$ contains the value of $\frac{\partial {f}_{\mathit{i}}}{\partial {x}_{\mathit{j}}}$ at the current point $x$, for $\mathit{i}=1,2,\dots ,m$ and $\mathit{j}=1,2,\dots ,n$.

6:
$\mathbf{ldfjac}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the first dimension of the array
fjac as declared in the (sub)program from which
e04fcf is called.

7:
$\mathbf{s}\left({\mathbf{n}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Input

On entry: the singular values of the current approximation to the Jacobian matrix. Thus
s may be useful as information about the structure of your problem.

8:
$\mathbf{igrade}$ – Integer
Input

On entry:
e04fcf estimates the dimension of the subspace for which the Jacobian matrix can be used as a valid approximation to the curvature (see
Gill and Murray (1978)). This estimate is called the grade of the Jacobian matrix, and
igrade gives its current value.

9:
$\mathbf{niter}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the number of iterations which have been performed in e04fcf.

10:
$\mathbf{nf}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the number of times that
lsqfun has been called so far. (However, for intermediate calls of
lsqmon,
nf is calculated on the assumption that the latest linear search has been successful. If this is not the case, the
$n$ evaluations allowed for approximating the Jacobian at the new point will not in fact have been made.
nf will be accurate at the final call of
lsqmon.)

11:
$\mathbf{iw}\left({\mathbf{liw}}\right)$ – Integer array
Workspace

12:
$\mathbf{liw}$ – Integer
Input

13:
$\mathbf{w}\left({\mathbf{lw}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Workspace

14:
$\mathbf{lw}$ – Integer
Input

These arguments correspond to the arguments
iw,
liw,
w and
lw of
e04fcf. They are included in
lsqmon's argument list primarily for when
e04fcf is called by other Library routines.
lsqmon must either be a module subprogram USEd by, or declared as EXTERNAL in, the (sub)program from which
e04fcf is called. Arguments denoted as
Input must
not be changed by this procedure.
Note: you should normally print the sum of squares of residuals, so as to be able to examine the sequence of values of
$F\left(x\right)$ mentioned in
Section 7. It is usually helpful to print
xc, the estimated gradient of the sum of squares,
niter and
nf.

5:
$\mathbf{iprint}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the frequency with which
lsqmon is to be called.
If
${\mathbf{iprint}}>0$,
lsqmon is called once every
iprint iterations and just before exit from
e04fcf.
If
${\mathbf{iprint}}=0$,
lsqmon is just called at the final point.
If
${\mathbf{iprint}}<0$,
lsqmon is not called at all.
iprint should normally be set to a small positive number.
Suggested value:
${\mathbf{iprint}}=1$.

6:
$\mathbf{maxcal}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the limit you set on the number of times that
lsqfun may be called by
e04fcf. There will be an error exit (see
Section 6) after
maxcal calls of
lsqfun.
Suggested value:
${\mathbf{maxcal}}=400\times {\mathbf{n}}$.
Constraint:
${\mathbf{maxcal}}\ge 1$.

7:
$\mathbf{eta}$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp)
Input

Every iteration of e04fcf involves a linear minimization, i.e., minimization of $F\left({x}^{\left(k\right)}+{\alpha}^{\left(k\right)}{p}^{\left(k\right)}\right)$ with respect to ${\alpha}^{\left(k\right)}$.
On entry: specifies how accurately the linear minimizations are to be performed. The minimum with respect to
${\alpha}^{\left(k\right)}$ will be located more accurately for small values of
eta (say,
$0.01$) than for large values (say,
$0.9$). Although accurate linear minimizations will generally reduce the number of iterations performed by
e04fcf, they will increase the number of calls of
lsqfun made each iteration. On balance it is usually more efficient to perform a low accuracy minimization.
Suggested value:
${\mathbf{eta}}=0.5$ (${\mathbf{eta}}=0.0$ if ${\mathbf{n}}=1$).
Constraint:
$0.0\le {\mathbf{eta}}<1.0$.

8:
$\mathbf{xtol}$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp)
Input

On entry: the accuracy in
$x$ to which the solution is required.
If
${x}_{\mathrm{true}}$ is the true value of
$x$ at the minimum, then
${x}_{\mathrm{sol}}$, the estimated position before a normal exit, is such that
where
$\Vert y\Vert =\sqrt{{\displaystyle \sum _{j=1}^{n}}{y}_{j}^{2}}$. For example, if the elements of
${x}_{\mathrm{sol}}$ are not much larger than
$1.0$ in modulus and if
${\mathbf{xtol}}=\text{1.0E\u22125}$, then
${x}_{\mathrm{sol}}$ is usually accurate to about five decimal places. (For further details see
Section 7.)
Suggested value:
if
$F\left(x\right)$ and the variables are scaled roughly as described in
Section 9 and
$\epsilon $ is the
machine precision, then a setting of order
${\mathbf{xtol}}=\sqrt{\epsilon}$ will usually be appropriate. If
xtol is set to
$0.0$ or some positive value less than
$10\epsilon $,
e04fcf will use
$10\epsilon $ instead of
xtol, since
$10\epsilon $ is probably the smallest reasonable setting.
Constraint:
${\mathbf{xtol}}\ge 0.0$.

9:
$\mathbf{stepmx}$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp)
Input

On entry: an estimate of the Euclidean distance between the solution and the starting point supplied by you. (For maximum efficiency, a slight overestimate is preferable.)
e04fcf will ensure that, for each iteration,
where
$k$ is the iteration number. Thus, if the problem has more than one solution,
e04fcf is most likely to find the one nearest to the starting point. On difficult problems, a realistic choice can prevent the sequence
${x}^{\left(k\right)}$ entering a region where the problem is illbehaved and can help avoid overflow in the evaluation of
$F\left(x\right)$. However, an underestimate of
stepmx can lead to inefficiency.
Suggested value:
${\mathbf{stepmx}}=100000.0$.
Constraint:
${\mathbf{stepmx}}\ge {\mathbf{xtol}}$.

10:
$\mathbf{x}\left({\mathbf{n}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Input/Output

On entry: ${\mathbf{x}}\left(\mathit{j}\right)$ must be set to a guess at the $\mathit{j}$th component of the position of the minimum, for $\mathit{j}=1,2,\dots ,n$.
On exit: the final point ${x}^{\left(k\right)}$. Thus, if ${\mathbf{ifail}}={\mathbf{0}}$ on exit, ${\mathbf{x}}\left(j\right)$ is the $j$th component of the estimated position of the minimum.

11:
$\mathbf{fsumsq}$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp)
Output

On exit: the value of
$F\left(x\right)$, the sum of squares of the residuals
${f}_{i}\left(x\right)$, at the final point given in
x.

12:
$\mathbf{fvec}\left({\mathbf{m}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Output

On exit: the value of the residual
${f}_{\mathit{i}}\left(x\right)$ at the final point given in
x, for
$\mathit{i}=1,2,\dots ,m$.

13:
$\mathbf{fjac}\left({\mathbf{ldfjac}},{\mathbf{n}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Output

On exit: the estimate of the first derivative
$\frac{\partial {f}_{\mathit{i}}}{\partial {x}_{\mathit{j}}}$ at the final point given in
x, for
$\mathit{i}=1,2,\dots ,m$ and
$\mathit{j}=1,2,\dots ,n$.

14:
$\mathbf{ldfjac}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the first dimension of the array
fjac as declared in the (sub)program from which
e04fcf is called.
Constraint:
${\mathbf{ldfjac}}\ge {\mathbf{m}}$.

15:
$\mathbf{s}\left({\mathbf{n}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Output

On exit: the singular values of the estimated Jacobian matrix at the final point. Thus
s may be useful as information about the structure of your problem.

16:
$\mathbf{v}\left({\mathbf{ldv}},{\mathbf{n}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Output

On exit: the matrix
$V$ associated with the singular value decomposition
of the estimated Jacobian matrix at the final point, stored by columns. This matrix may be useful for statistical purposes, since it is the matrix of orthonormalized eigenvectors of
${J}^{\mathrm{T}}J$.

17:
$\mathbf{ldv}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the first dimension of the array
v as declared in the (sub)program from which
e04fcf is called.
Constraint:
${\mathbf{ldv}}\ge {\mathbf{n}}$.

18:
$\mathbf{niter}$ – Integer
Output

On exit: the number of iterations which have been performed in e04fcf.

19:
$\mathbf{nf}$ – Integer
Output

On exit: the number of times that the residuals have been evaluated (i.e., number of calls of
lsqfun).

20:
$\mathbf{iw}\left({\mathbf{liw}}\right)$ – Integer array
Workspace

21:
$\mathbf{liw}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the dimension of the array
iw as declared in the (sub)program from which
e04fcf is called.
Constraint:
${\mathbf{liw}}\ge 1$.

22:
$\mathbf{w}\left({\mathbf{lw}}\right)$ – Real (Kind=nag_wp) array
Workspace

23:
$\mathbf{lw}$ – Integer
Input

On entry: the dimension of the array
w as declared in the (sub)program from which
e04fcf is called.
Constraints:
 if ${\mathbf{n}}>1$, ${\mathbf{lw}}\ge 6\times {\mathbf{n}}+{\mathbf{m}}\times {\mathbf{n}}+2\times {\mathbf{m}}+{\mathbf{n}}\times \left({\mathbf{n}}1\right)/2$;
 if ${\mathbf{n}}=1$, ${\mathbf{lw}}\ge 7+3\times {\mathbf{m}}$.

24:
$\mathbf{ifail}$ – Integer
Input/Output

On entry:
ifail must be set to
$0$,
$1$ or
$1$ to set behaviour on detection of an error; these values have no effect when no error is detected.
A value of $0$ causes the printing of an error message and program execution will be halted; otherwise program execution continues. A value of $1$ means that an error message is printed while a value of $1$ means that it is not.
If halting is not appropriate, the value
$1$ or
$1$ is recommended. If message printing is undesirable, then the value
$1$ is recommended. Otherwise, the value
$1$ is recommended since useful values can be provided in some output arguments even when
${\mathbf{ifail}}\ne {\mathbf{0}}$ on exit.
When the value $\mathbf{1}$ or $\mathbf{1}$ is used it is essential to test the value of ifail on exit.
On exit:
${\mathbf{ifail}}={\mathbf{0}}$ unless the routine detects an error or a warning has been flagged (see
Section 6).
6
Error Indicators and Warnings
If on entry
${\mathbf{ifail}}=0$ or
$1$, explanatory error messages are output on the current error message unit (as defined by
x04aaf).
Errors or warnings detected by the routine:
Note: in some cases e04fcf may return useful information.
 ${\mathbf{ifail}}=1$

On entry, ${\mathbf{eta}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: $0.0\le {\mathbf{eta}}<1.0$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{ldfjac}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$ and ${\mathbf{m}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: ${\mathbf{ldfjac}}\ge {\mathbf{m}}$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{ldv}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$ and ${\mathbf{n}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: ${\mathbf{ldv}}\ge {\mathbf{n}}$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{liw}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: ${\mathbf{liw}}\ge 1$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{m}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$ and ${\mathbf{n}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: ${\mathbf{m}}\ge {\mathbf{n}}$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{maxcal}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: ${\mathbf{maxcal}}\ge 1$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{n}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: ${\mathbf{n}}\ge 1$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{n}}=1$ and ${\mathbf{lw}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: if ${\mathbf{n}}=1$ then ${\mathbf{lw}}\ge 7+3\times {\mathbf{m}}$; that is, $\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{n}}>1$ and ${\mathbf{lw}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: if ${\mathbf{n}}>1$ then ${\mathbf{lw}}\ge 6\times {\mathbf{n}}+{\mathbf{m}}\times {\mathbf{n}}+2\times {\mathbf{m}}+{\mathbf{n}}\times \left({\mathbf{n}}1\right)/2$; that is, $\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{stepmx}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$ and ${\mathbf{xtol}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: ${\mathbf{stepmx}}\ge {\mathbf{xtol}}$.
On entry, ${\mathbf{xtol}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$.
Constraint: ${\mathbf{xtol}}\ge 0.0$.
 ${\mathbf{ifail}}=2$

There have been
${\mathbf{maxcal}}=\u2329\mathit{\text{value}}\u232a$ calls to
lsqfun.
If steady reductions in the sum of squares,
$F\left(x\right)$, were monitored up to the point where this exit occurred, then the exit probably occurred simply because
maxcal was set too small, so the calculations should be restarted from the final point held in
x. This exit may also indicate that
$F\left(x\right)$ has no minimum.
The error may also be caused by mistakes in
lsqfun, by the formulation of the problem or by an awkward function. If there are no such mistakes, it is worth restarting the calculations from a different starting point (not the point at which the failure occurred) in order to avoid the region which caused the failure.
 ${\mathbf{ifail}}=3$

The conditions for a minimum have not all been satisfied, but a lower point could not be found. See
Section 7 for further information.
The error may also be caused by mistakes in
lsqfun, by the formulation of the problem or by an awkward function. If there are no such mistakes, it is worth restarting the calculations from a different starting point (not the point at which the failure occurred) in order to avoid the region which caused the failure.
 ${\mathbf{ifail}}=4$

Failure in computing SVD of estimated Jacobian matrix.
It may be worth applying e04fcf again starting with an initial approximation which is not too close to the point at which the failure occurred.
The error may also be caused by mistakes in
lsqfun, by the formulation of the problem or by an awkward function. If there are no such mistakes, it is worth restarting the calculations from a different starting point (not the point at which the failure occurred) in order to avoid the region which caused the failure.
 ${\mathbf{ifail}}<0$

User requested termination by setting
iflag negative in
lsqfun.
 ${\mathbf{ifail}}=99$
An unexpected error has been triggered by this routine. Please
contact
NAG.
See
Section 7 in the Introduction to the NAG Library FL Interface for further information.
 ${\mathbf{ifail}}=399$
Your licence key may have expired or may not have been installed correctly.
See
Section 8 in the Introduction to the NAG Library FL Interface for further information.
 ${\mathbf{ifail}}=999$
Dynamic memory allocation failed.
See
Section 9 in the Introduction to the NAG Library FL Interface for further information.
7
Accuracy
A successful exit (
${\mathbf{ifail}}={\mathbf{0}}$) is made from
e04fcf when (B1, B2 and B3) or B4 or B5 hold, where
and where
$\Vert .\Vert $ and
$\epsilon $ are as defined in
Section 5, and
${F}^{\left(k\right)}$ and
${g}^{\left(k\right)}$ are the values of
$F\left(x\right)$ and its vector of estimated first derivatives at
${x}^{\left(k\right)}$. If
${\mathbf{ifail}}={\mathbf{0}}$ then the vector in
x on exit,
${x}_{\mathrm{sol}}$, is almost certainly an estimate of
${x}_{\mathrm{true}}$, the position of the minimum to the accuracy specified by
xtol.
If
${\mathbf{ifail}}={\mathbf{3}}$, then
${x}_{\mathrm{sol}}$ may still be a good estimate of
${x}_{\mathrm{true}}$, but to verify this you should make the following checks. If

(a)the sequence $\left\{F\left({x}^{\left(k\right)}\right)\right\}$ converges to $F\left({x}_{\mathrm{sol}}\right)$ at a superlinear or a fast linear rate, and

(b)$g{\left({x}_{\mathrm{sol}}\right)}^{\mathrm{T}}g\left({x}_{\mathrm{sol}}\right)<10\epsilon $, where $\mathrm{T}$ denotes transpose, then it is almost certain that ${x}_{\mathrm{sol}}$ is a close approximation to the minimum. When (b) is true, then usually $F\left({x}_{\mathrm{sol}}\right)$ is a close approximation to $F\left({x}_{\mathrm{true}}\right)$. The values of $F\left({x}^{\left(k\right)}\right)$ can be calculated in lsqmon, and the vector $g\left({x}_{\mathrm{sol}}\right)$ can be calculated from the contents of fvec and fjac on exit from e04fcf.
Further suggestions about confirmation of a computed solution are given in the
E04 Chapter Introduction.
8
Parallelism and Performance
e04fcf is threaded by NAG for parallel execution in multithreaded implementations of the NAG Library.
e04fcf makes calls to BLAS and/or LAPACK routines, which may be threaded within the vendor library used by this implementation. Consult the documentation for the vendor library for further information.
Please consult the
X06 Chapter Introduction for information on how to control and interrogate the OpenMP environment used within this routine. Please also consult the
Users' Note for your implementation for any additional implementationspecific information.
The number of iterations required depends on the number of variables, the number of residuals, the behaviour of
$F\left(x\right)$, the accuracy demanded and the distance of the starting point from the solution. The number of multiplications performed per iteration of
e04fcf varies, but for
$m\gg n$ is approximately
$n\times {m}^{2}+\mathit{O}\left({n}^{3}\right)$. In addition, each iteration makes at least
$n+1$ calls of
lsqfun. So, unless the residuals can be evaluated very quickly, the run time will be dominated by the time spent in
lsqfun.
Ideally, the problem should be scaled so that, at the solution, $F\left(x\right)$ and the corresponding values of the ${x}_{j}$ are each in the range $\left(1,+1\right)$, and so that at points one unit away from the solution, $F\left(x\right)$ differs from its value at the solution by approximately one unit. This will usually imply that the Hessian matrix of $F\left(x\right)$ at the solution is wellconditioned. It is unlikely that you will be able to follow these recommendations very closely, but it is worth trying (by guesswork), as sensible scaling will reduce the difficulty of the minimization problem, so that e04fcf will take less computer time.
When the sum of squares represents the goodnessoffit of a nonlinear model to observed data, elements of the variancecovariance matrix of the estimated regression coefficients can be computed by a subsequent call to
e04ycf, using information returned in the arrays
s and
v. See
e04ycf for further details.
10
Example
This example finds least squares estimates of
${x}_{1},{x}_{2}$ and
${x}_{3}$ in the model
using the
$15$ sets of data given in the following table.
The program uses
$\left(0.5,1.0,1.5\right)$ as the initial guess at the position of the minimum.
10.1
Program Text
10.2
Program Data
10.3
Program Results