E04JCF (PDF version)
E04 Chapter Contents
E04 Chapter Introduction
NAG Library Manual

NAG Library Routine Document

E04JCF

Note:  before using this routine, please read the Users' Note for your implementation to check the interpretation of bold italicised terms and other implementation-dependent details.

 Contents

    1  Purpose
    7  Accuracy

1  Purpose

E04JCF is an easy-to-use algorithm that uses methods of quadratic approximation to find a minimum of an objective function F over xRn, subject to fixed lower and upper bounds on the independent variables x1,x2,,xn. Derivatives of F are not required.
The routine is intended for functions that are continuous and that have continuous first and second derivatives (although it will usually work even if the derivatives have occasional discontinuities). Efficiency is maintained for large n.

2  Specification

SUBROUTINE E04JCF ( OBJFUN, N, NPT, X, BL, BU, RHOBEG, RHOEND, MONFUN, MAXCAL, F, NF, IUSER, RUSER, IFAIL)
INTEGER  N, NPT, MAXCAL, NF, IUSER(*), IFAIL
REAL (KIND=nag_wp)  X(N), BL(N), BU(N), RHOBEG, RHOEND, F, RUSER(*)
EXTERNAL  OBJFUN, MONFUN

3  Description

E04JCF is applicable to problems of the form:
minimize xRn Fx   subject to   x u   and   u ,  
where F is a nonlinear scalar function whose derivatives may be unavailable, and where the bound vectors are elements of Rn. Relational operators between vectors are interpreted elementwise.
Fixing variables (that is, setting i=ui for some i) is allowed in E04JCF.
You must supply a subroutine to calculate the value of F at any given point x.
The method used by E04JCF is based on BOBYQA, the method of Bound Optimization BY Quadratic Approximation described in Powell (2009). In particular, each iteration of E04JCF generates a quadratic approximation Q to F that agrees with F at m automatically chosen interpolation points. The value of m is a constant prescribed by you. Updates to the independent variables mostly occur from approximate solutions to trust-region subproblems, using the current quadratic model.

4  References

Powell M J D (2009) The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives Report DAMTP 2009/NA06 University of Cambridge http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/na/NA_papers/NA2009_06.pdf

5  Parameters

1:     OBJFUN – SUBROUTINE, supplied by the user.External Procedure
OBJFUN must evaluate the objective function F at a specified vector x.
The specification of OBJFUN is:
SUBROUTINE OBJFUN ( N, X, F, IUSER, RUSER, INFORM)
INTEGER  N, IUSER(*), INFORM
REAL (KIND=nag_wp)  X(N), F, RUSER(*)
1:     N – INTEGERInput
On entry: n, the number of independent variables.
2:     XN – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayInput
On entry: x, the vector at which the objective function is to be evaluated.
3:     F – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Output
On exit: must be set to the value of the objective function at x, unless you have specified termination of the current problem using INFORM.
4:     IUSER* – INTEGER arrayUser Workspace
5:     RUSER* – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayUser Workspace
OBJFUN is called with the parameters IUSER and RUSER as supplied to E04JCF. You are free to use the arrays IUSER and RUSER to supply information to OBJFUN as an alternative to using COMMON global variables.
6:     INFORM – INTEGEROutput
On exit: must be set to a value describing the action to be taken by the solver on return from OBJFUN. Specifically, if the value is negative the solution of the current problem will terminate immediately; otherwise, computations will continue.
OBJFUN must either be a module subprogram USEd by, or declared as EXTERNAL in, the (sub)program from which E04JCF is called. Parameters denoted as Input must not be changed by this procedure.
2:     N – INTEGERInput
On entry: n, the number of independent variables.
Constraint: N2 and nr2, where nr denotes the number of non-fixed variables.
3:     NPT – INTEGERInput
On entry: m, the number of interpolation conditions imposed on the quadratic approximation at each iteration.
Suggested value: NPT=2×nr+1, where nr denotes the number of non-fixed variables.
Constraint: nr+2NPTnr+1×nr+22, where nr denotes the number of non-fixed variables.
4:     XN – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayInput/Output
On entry: an estimate of the position of the minimum. If any component is out-of-bounds it is replaced internally by the bound it violates.
On exit: the lowest point found during the calculations. Thus, if IFAIL=0 on exit, X is the position of the minimum.
5:     BLN – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayInput
6:     BUN – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayInput
On entry: the fixed vectors of bounds: the lower bounds  and the upper bounds u, respectively. To signify that a variable is unbounded you should choose a large scalar r appropriate to your problem, then set the lower bound on that variable to -r and the upper bound to r. For well-scaled problems r=rmax14 may be suitable, where rmax denotes the largest positive model number (see X02ALF).
Constraints:
  • if Xi is to be fixed at BLi, then BLi=BUi;
  • otherwise BUi-BLi2.0×RHOBEG, for i=1,2,,N.
7:     RHOBEG – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Input
On entry: an initial lower bound on the value of the trust-region radius.
Suggested value: RHOBEG should be about one tenth of the greatest expected overall change to a variable: the initial quadratic model will be constructed by taking steps from the initial X of length RHOBEG along each coordinate direction.
Constraints:
  • RHOBEG>0.0;
  • RHOBEGRHOEND.
8:     RHOEND – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Input
On entry: a final lower bound on the value of the trust-region radius.
Suggested value: RHOEND should indicate the absolute accuracy that is required in the final values of the variables.
Constraint: RHOEND>0.0.
9:     MONFUN – SUBROUTINE, supplied by the NAG Library or the user.External Procedure
MONFUN may be used to monitor the optimization process. It is invoked every time a new trust-region radius is chosen.
If no monitoring is required, MONFUN may be the dummy monitoring routine E04JCP supplied by the NAG Library.
The specification of MONFUN is:
SUBROUTINE MONFUN ( N, NF, X, F, RHO, IUSER, RUSER, INFORM)
INTEGER  N, NF, IUSER(*), INFORM
REAL (KIND=nag_wp)  X(N), F, RHO, RUSER(*)
1:     N – INTEGERInput
On entry: n, the number of independent variables.
2:     NF – INTEGERInput
On entry: the cumulative number of calls made to OBJFUN.
3:     XN – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayInput
On entry: the current best point.
4:     F – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Input
On entry: the value of OBJFUN at X.
5:     RHO – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Input
On entry: a lower bound on the current trust-region radius.
6:     IUSER* – INTEGER arrayUser Workspace
7:     RUSER* – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayUser Workspace
MONFUN is called with the parameters IUSER and RUSER as supplied to E04JCF. You are free to use the arrays IUSER and RUSER to supply information to MONFUN as an alternative to using COMMON global variables.
8:     INFORM – INTEGEROutput
On exit: must be set to a value describing the action to be taken by the solver on return from MONFUN. Specifically, if the value is negative the solution of the current problem will terminate immediately; otherwise, computations will continue.
MONFUN must either be a module subprogram USEd by, or declared as EXTERNAL in, the (sub)program from which E04JCF is called. Parameters denoted as Input must not be changed by this procedure.
10:   MAXCAL – INTEGERInput
On entry: the maximum permitted number of calls to OBJFUN.
Constraint: MAXCAL1.
11:   F – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Output
On exit: the function value at the lowest point found (X).
12:   NF – INTEGEROutput
On exit: unless IFAIL=1 or -999 on exit, the total number of calls made to OBJFUN.
13:   IUSER* – INTEGER arrayUser Workspace
14:   RUSER* – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayUser Workspace
IUSER and RUSER are not used by E04JCF, but are passed directly to OBJFUN and MONFUN and may be used to pass information to these routines as an alternative to using COMMON global variables.
15:   IFAIL – INTEGERInput/Output
On entry: IFAIL must be set to 0, -1​ or ​1. If you are unfamiliar with this parameter you should refer to Section 3.3 in the Essential Introduction for details.
For environments where it might be inappropriate to halt program execution when an error is detected, the value -1​ or ​1 is recommended. If the output of error messages is undesirable, then the value 1 is recommended. Otherwise, if you are not familiar with this parameter, the recommended value is 0. When the value -1​ or ​1 is used it is essential to test the value of IFAIL on exit.
On exit: IFAIL=0 unless the routine detects an error or a warning has been flagged (see Section 6).
E04JCF returns with IFAIL=0 if the final trust-region radius has reached its lower bound RHOEND.

6  Error Indicators and Warnings

If on entry IFAIL=0 or -1, explanatory error messages are output on the current error message unit (as defined by X04AAF).
Errors or warnings detected by the routine:
IFAIL=1
On entry, MAXCAL=value.
Constraint: MAXCAL1.
On entry, RHOBEG=value, BLi=value, BUi=value and i=value.
Constraint: if BLiBUi in coordinate i, then BUi-BLi2×RHOBEG.
On entry, RHOBEG=value.
Constraint: RHOBEG>0.0.
On entry, RHOBEG=value and RHOEND=value.
Constraint: RHOENDRHOBEG.
On entry, RHOEND=value.
Constraint: RHOEND>0.0.
There were nr=value unequal bounds.
Constraint: nr2.
There were nr=value unequal bounds and NPT=value on entry.
Constraint: nr+2NPTnr+1×nr+22.
IFAIL=2
The function evaluations limit was reached: OBJFUN has been called MAXCAL times.
IFAIL=3
The predicted reduction in a trust-region step was non-positive. Check your specification of OBJFUN and whether the function needs rescaling. Try a different initial X.
IFAIL=4
A rescue procedure has been called in order to correct damage from rounding errors when computing an update to a quadratic approximation of F, but no further progess could be made. Check your specification of OBJFUN and whether the function needs rescaling. Try a different initial X.
IFAIL=5
User-supplied monitoring routine requested termination.
User-supplied objective function requested termination.
IFAIL=-99
An unexpected error has been triggered by this routine. Please contact NAG.
See Section 3.8 in the Essential Introduction for further information.
IFAIL=-399
Your licence key may have expired or may not have been installed correctly.
See Section 3.7 in the Essential Introduction for further information.
IFAIL=-999
Dynamic memory allocation failed.
See Section 3.6 in the Essential Introduction for further information.

7  Accuracy

Experience shows that, in many cases, on successful termination the -norm distance from the best point x to a local minimum of F is less than 10×RHOEND, unless RHOEND is so small that such accuracy is unattainable.

8  Parallelism and Performance

E04JCF is not threaded by NAG in any implementation.
E04JCF makes calls to BLAS and/or LAPACK routines, which may be threaded within the vendor library used by this implementation. Consult the documentation for the vendor library for further information.
Please consult the X06 Chapter Introduction for information on how to control and interrogate the OpenMP environment used within this routine. Please also consult the Users' Note for your implementation for any additional implementation-specific information.

9  Further Comments

For each invocation of E04JCF, local workspace arrays of fixed length are allocated internally. The total size of these arrays amounts to NPT+6×NPT+nr+nr×3nr+212 real elements and nr integer elements, where nr denotes the number of non-fixed variables; that is, the total size is Onr4. If you follow the recommendation for the choice of NPT on entry, this total size reduces to Onr2.
Usually the total number of function evaluations (NF) is substantially less than Onr2, and often, if NPT=2×nr+1 on entry, NF is only of magnitude nr or less.

10  Example

This example involves the minimization of
F = x1+10x2 2 +5 x3 - x4 2 + x2-2 x3 4 +10 x1 - x4 4  
subject to
-1x1 3, -2x2 0, -1x4 3,  
starting from the initial guess 3,-1,0,1 .

10.1  Program Text

Program Text (e04jcfe.f90)

10.2  Program Data

None.

10.3  Program Results

Program Results (e04jcfe.r)


E04JCF (PDF version)
E04 Chapter Contents
E04 Chapter Introduction
NAG Library Manual

© The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd, Oxford, UK. 2015