S Chapter Contents
S Chapter Introduction
NAG Library Manual

# NAG Library Routine DocumentS15ACF

Note:  before using this routine, please read the Users' Note for your implementation to check the interpretation of bold italicised terms and other implementation-dependent details.

## 1  Purpose

S15ACF returns the value of the complement of the cumulative Normal distribution function, $Q\left(x\right)$, via the function name.

## 2  Specification

 FUNCTION S15ACF ( X, IFAIL)
 REAL (KIND=nag_wp) S15ACF
 INTEGER IFAIL REAL (KIND=nag_wp) X

## 3  Description

S15ACF evaluates an approximate value for the complement of the cumulative Normal distribution function
 $Qx=12π∫x∞e-u2/2du.$
The routine is based on the fact that
 $Qx=12erfcx2$
and it calls S15ADF to obtain the necessary value of $\mathit{erfc}$, the complementary error function.

## 4  References

Abramowitz M and Stegun I A (1972) Handbook of Mathematical Functions (3rd Edition) Dover Publications

## 5  Parameters

1:     X – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Input
On entry: the argument $x$ of the function.
2:     IFAIL – INTEGERInput/Output
On entry: IFAIL must be set to $0$, $-1\text{​ or ​}1$. If you are unfamiliar with this parameter you should refer to Section 3.3 in the Essential Introduction for details.
For environments where it might be inappropriate to halt program execution when an error is detected, the value $-1\text{​ or ​}1$ is recommended. If the output of error messages is undesirable, then the value $1$ is recommended. Otherwise, if you are not familiar with this parameter, the recommended value is $0$. When the value $-\mathbf{1}\text{​ or ​}\mathbf{1}$ is used it is essential to test the value of IFAIL on exit.
On exit: ${\mathbf{IFAIL}}={\mathbf{0}}$ unless the routine detects an error or a warning has been flagged (see Section 6).

## 6  Error Indicators and Warnings

There are no failure exits from this routine. The parameter IFAIL is included for consistency with other routines in this chapter.

## 7  Accuracy

Because of its close relationship with $\mathit{erfc}$ the accuracy of this routine is very similar to that in S15ADF. If $\epsilon$ and $\delta$ are the relative errors in result and argument, respectively, then in principle they are related by
 $ε≃ x e -x2/2 2πQx δ .$
For $x$ negative or small positive this factor is always less than one and accuracy is mainly limited by machine precision. For large positive $x$ we find $\epsilon \sim {x}^{2}\delta$ and hence to a certain extent relative accuracy is unavoidably lost. However the absolute error in the result, $E$, is given by
 $E≃ x e -x2/2 2π δ$
and since this factor is always less than one absolute accuracy can be guaranteed for all $x$.

None.

## 9  Example

This example reads values of the argument $x$ from a file, evaluates the function at each value of $x$ and prints the results.

### 9.1  Program Text

Program Text (s15acfe.f90)

### 9.2  Program Data

Program Data (s15acfe.d)

### 9.3  Program Results

Program Results (s15acfe.r)